|
|
Children of Men
Director: Alfonso Cuaron
"Children of Men" is simply the best science fiction film of the last
ten years, bar nothing. It is thought provoking, intelligent, well
acted, perfectly set, and as close to perfect as makes no difference.
It is, in short, a masterpiece.
If I have a weakness in film it is for acting. It is my great and
abiding love. Nothing makes me so happy as to see actual dead set
acting in a film. If that happens, more than likely, I become a fan.
"Children of Men" delivers on this front in simply amazing
quantities. Clive Owen, Julianne Moore and Michael Caine were all
exceptionally good, but more than that, they were exceptionally good
within the parameters of an exceptionally good script. These two
facts alone make the film stand tall on any stage in the land, and
when one considers that it is a science fiction film, a genre filled
to bursting with arrant crap, it makes "Children of Men" stand very
tall indeed. I recommend seeing this one simply on the basis of the
acting.
The script also is exceptional. It takes a very broad canvas and
makes a highly believable future world and then, joy of joys peoples
this world with people who behave in realistic ways, say realistic
things, and add life to the ideas that drive the film. This, dear
reader, is as rare as hen's teeth and I recommend "Children of Men"
purely on the basis of the script.
The direction is truly nothing short of astonishing. Most films are
made with a series of short, sometimes really short, "takes." Small
set pieces of sometimes a minute, sometimes only several seconds. In
these takes the actors act, the extras mill about, and the CGI gets
added in. The shots are then cut together into a vast mosaic of shots
that make up the film. In this age of "blizzard editing" sometimes
the shots are less than a second long. "Children of Men" takes an
utterly different approach. The shots are long, sometimes minutes at
a time. The sets are huge, peopled with good extras, filmed with
highly mobile hand held cameras, and acted in by stars. The effect is
simply mesmeric. It is exactly as if the viewer has become an
invisible eye that can float at will through a huge, real and utterly
fascinating universe as history happens. Until you have seen 150
extras, a tank, 30 explosions, another 50 extras and the star all
interact in what appears to be an unbroken two minute swooping shot
of a full scale urban battle, you haven't seen what film is really
capable of. When the same techniques are applied to a dinner party,
or to a romantic scene in the same kind of setting, it is like being
sucker punched by a wrecking ball. The fact that I cried like a baby
during parts of this film is not that interesting to me. I have cried in
movies before. In this one though, I came to on a number of
occasions and literally found that my mouth was hanging open,
slackly. That Alfonso Cuaron was capable of even conceiving the
techniques in this film is worthy of the highest accolades, that he
brought them off, is nothing short of astonishing, that he brought
them off well, with real actors acting in the middle of the scenes is
unbelieveable.
"Children of Men" is the real life blood of cinema. I doubt that
Alfonso Cuaron will be getting much in the way of awards at the next
Academy backslapping session but I will guarantee that the
backslappers will be copying his work for the next few years, or
maybe decades.
You like film? See this one ten times.
(C)opyright Alex Rieneck, 2007.
|
|
Do the fun 12 question Ethics survey
|