Sylvano's
Blog

Sylvano
"A blog sounds like
something that blocks
the S-bend..."

RSS

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Rebuilding the Berlin Wall

Monday 7th June 1999

A Kosovo peace deal comes and goes. Expect more of the same, for while the "peace deal" involves Kosovo remaining part of Serbia or Kosovo becoming independent of Serbia it will be unworkable. A partition is the only solution.

For it is the powers of east and west which are the squabbling parties here. The politcal line that demarcates east and west is what is underpins the resolution of this conflict.

The ongoing bombing of Serbian forces by NATO is clearly not working (yet?) if the Milosovic et al are still prepared to quibble. They would rather the bombing continue than sign to an agreed peace deal, if it involves unaccaptable conditions. That is, conditions more unacceptable than continued bombing.

What are these unacceptable conditions? Fundamentally, it comes down to the "slicing of the pie". The "who gets what" issue. Territory and resources.

But it aint what Serbian leaders want that is at heart, and nor is it what the KLA wants neither. It's NATO and Russia.

NATO wants the full retreat of Serbian forces from Kosovo, with NATO and Russian troops to keep the peace. The Russians are saying their troops would not be under NATO command. And I bet they don't want an independent Kosovo. They want a Kosovo that is part of Serbia, with Russian peace keepers. NATO would be a guest peace keeping force. NATO would, ofcourse, prefer the reverse.

A compromise is the only way. A dirty big line in the sand, where Serbia is on one side and a new independent Kosovo slice is on the other. The Russians and NATO will then keep the peace, which is code for saying, they will monitor that the line doth shift no more.

Ofcourse, post Berlin wall geo-politics will demand a new rhetoric to hide the clear regression to a classic stand-off situation. Let us follow the news and watch this language unfold before us.

This is why NATO hasn't sent in ground troops. That would make it a war with Russia. The west doesn't give two hoots what Serbia would think if we sent in troops. It is Russia to whom some feared respect is due. We can bomb Serbian forces and resources for as long as we are prepared to underwrite the action, because it is only an annoyance to Serbia and Kosovo. Once we sent in troops to set up camp and "claim territory", we enter a new game.

And we have to damn well make sure that we have a "peace deal" with Russia before we do that.

end of rant.


Useful Links

TABBY'S PAGE O'CRAP

Humanist Discussion Group

Cultural Studies

On Being Authentic

Friday 4th June 1999

Copyright Dr. Carl
authentic actions. seen as trustworthy, reliable, genuine.

authorial actions. we are the masters of our own creation. playing parts both in the construction and interpretation of our own narratives (which i might add, for this purpose be seen as fictional - one's own interpretation of personal narrative differs greatly from those of another reader).

but, the notion of authoritarial control (interestingly, autism - "the abnormal self-absorption condition - characterised by lack of response to people and limited ability to communicate" is seen directly after authorship in the dictionary) is an egotistical fantasy.

to take the post-modernist angle, that everything is a simulacrum of something previous, the idea that one is author to one's own actions can be seen more in terms of personal plagiarism.

unless completely solipstical (sadly impossible) one must acknowledge the prevailing influences of a thousand thousand external forces which pull and push the personal plot and interweave it within the grand scheme of things.

therefore, to be "authentic in our actions" one must firstly be aware that the action of thought, the cognitive processes by which we define ourselves are themselves defined by other matters beyond our control.

when such a conclusion is known and accepted, one may certainly try to "author" one's actions, but i would suggest "editor" would be a more apt allegory.

end of Dr. Carl's rant.

ARCHIVE

2007
Jun
Mar

2006
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Mar
Feb

2005
May

2001
Nov
Oct
Aug
May
Mar

2000
Sep
Jul
Jun
May
Jan

1999
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan






Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Copyright Notice
Third Party Products
General Disclaimer






.

.